Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue ; 26(4): 331-334, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33351300

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore and analyze the effect of liquid dressing in relieving pain and preventing incision adhesion after circumcision and its clinical application value. METHODS: Ninety male patients underwent circumcision in Hangzhou Third People's Hospital from September to November 2019, with the incision covered with liquid dressing + vaseline gauze (group A, n = 30), liquid dressing alone (group B, n = 30) or vaseline gauze only (group C, n = 30). At 2, 4 and 6 days after surgery, we compared the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain intensity at dressing change, incision bleeding after dressing removal and incidence of postoperative complications among the three groups of patients. RESULTS: At 2, 4 and 6 days after surgery, the VAS pain score and incidence of incision bleeding were significantly lower in groups A and B than in C (P < 0.05). At 2 days, both the VAS pain score and incidence of incision bleeding were markedly decreased in group A as compared with those in group B (P < 0.05). At 4 and 6 days, the VAS pain score remained lower in group A than in B (P < 0.05), but the incidence rate of incision bleeding showed no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications among the three groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Liquid dressing can reduce pain intensity at dressing change, prevent incision adhesion and consequent dressing change-induced tearing and bleeding, and therefore promote incision healing after circumcision. Its combination with vaseline gauze can achieve an even better effect.


Assuntos
Bandagens/classificação , Circuncisão Masculina , Cicatrização , Humanos , Masculino , Dor/prevenção & controle , Medição da Dor
2.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci ; 29(11): 624-8, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24183357

RESUMO

The surgical, oncologic, and functional outcomes were retrospectively compared of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for the treatment of renal masses. Between January 2006 and November 2011, 115 LPNs and 97 OPNs were performed. The patients' demographics were matched. Their intraoperative and postoperative data, oncologic and renal function outcomes were compared. Surgical time, renal arterial occlusion time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative hospitalization days were shorter in the LPN group (p < 0.01). The total complications were comparable; however, LPN had a higher intraoperative complication due to 12 subcutaneous emphysemas. The LPN group was followed up with a mean time of 29.3 ± 14.4 months and the OPN group with a mean time of 31.2 ± 12.6 months. All patients survived and no distant relapse or metastasis were observed. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 60-month local recurrence-free survival were comparable with 92.4% after LPN and 93.8% after OPN, respectively (p = 0.57). The reduction of glomerular filtration rate was more obvious after LPN at the 3-month follow-up (p < 0.01), but similar between the two groups at the 30.2-month follow-up. LPN provides similar results in oncologic and functional outcomes when compared to OPN. Long-term observations are still required to the oncologic and function outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...